Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 26th Aug 2009 22:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 380851
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 21:46 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-26
With all the talk of sins I think it is clear that the gpl is a religion first and a license second.
I thought this was pretty funny though:
Two years later, Microsoft itself admits Vista failed.
No Microsoft never stated that, but it seems that the FSF doesn't care much about truth. But anyways if Vista is a failure then what does that make the Hurd?
I'm really getting tired of hearing rants from a collectivist who doesn't have to work for a living and no longer produces anything.
Software is a tool, not having the source does not make it immoral. If Stallman really believes that proprietary software is unethical then he should turn his computer off because hardware contains a ton of it. Oh and if he ever gets checked into a hospital he should demand to be treated only by medical devices that use open source.
Edited 2009-08-27 05:20 UTC