Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 26th Aug 2009 22:23 UTC
GNU, GPL, Open Source When Windows Vista was launched, the Free Software Foundation started its BadVista campaign, which was aimed at informing users about what the FSF considered user-restrictive features in Vista. Luckily for the FSF, Vista didn't really need a bad-mouthing campaign to fail. Now that Windows 7 is receiving a lot of positive press, the FSF dusted off the BadVista drum, and gave it a fresh coat of paint.
Thread beginning with comment 380887
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Meh.
by OddFox on Thu 27th Aug 2009 08:14 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Meh."
OddFox
Member since:
2005-10-05

About the rolling releases I would have figured that making use of portage to mask package versions you do not want changed would be a good method of keeping things in order. I don't have experience actually trying to get all that going, but I would have figured the tools had capabilities to allow oneself to strictly manage the software installed. I do hear a lot though from various users that Gentoo and the like suffer from problems in such deployments.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[7]: Meh.
by boldingd on Thu 27th Aug 2009 18:48 in reply to "RE[6]: Meh."
boldingd Member since:
2009-02-19

Long post cut short: count me among the people who have had terrible, terrible experiences with Gentoo. Like, system-is-unbootable, weekend-sucking experiences. Like, "screw this, Slackware 10 time" experiences. I really, really wish that emerge would, you know, tell you, or, God forbid, halt the operation, if the thing you try to do is known to break systems.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1