Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 28th Aug 2009 22:05 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 381360
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: I'd love to see the blood sucking companies just
by tyrione on Sat 29th Aug 2009 18:30
in reply to "RE[3]: I'd love to see the blood sucking companies just"
wait...so you're saying that unless you're the company that wrote the software/engineered the product, you shouldn't be allowed to sell it? So companies that sell products that they had nothing to do with creating are in your eyes 'blood sucking' ??
Don't confuse a license to sell another companies products to a company not licensed to sell another companies products and now sues that company for not extending a license to sell that company's goods.
Edited 2009-08-29 18:30 UTC
RE[5]: I'd love to see the blood sucking companies just
by Laurence on Mon 31st Aug 2009 23:25
in reply to "RE[4]: I'd love to see the blood sucking companies just"
Don't confuse a license to sell another companies products to a company not licensed to sell another companies products and now sues that company for not extending a license to sell that company's goods.
You don't need a licence to sell software, period.
The most Apple can do is have retail partners (ie resellers they endorse and recommend). What they can't do is dictate who can and can't sell their software.






Member since:
2007-03-13
wait...so you're saying that unless you're the company that wrote the software/engineered the product, you shouldn't be allowed to sell it? So companies that sell products that they had nothing to do with creating are in your eyes 'blood sucking' ??