Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 9th Sep 2009 22:29 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Thread beginning with comment 383395
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Only one choice for solid 3D under Linux - Nvidia
by IkeKrull on Fri 11th Sep 2009 03:15
in reply to "RE[6]: Only one choice for solid 3D under Linux - Nvidia"
Cos you're not saying 'lets wait for the benchmarks' you're writing post after post saying this is some kind of enormously significant milestone and we'll all have top notch ATI performance in the near future, without a shred of evidence to back it up.
And youre calling for Keith Packard to step down because of the intel graphics situation.
You trumpet the supposed superiority of the OSS driver development model, and in the next breath rail against its outcomes and insult one of the most important contributors to the effort.
Thats unhinged ranting, plain and simple.
RE[8]: Only one choice for solid 3D under Linux - Nvidia
by lemur2 on Fri 11th Sep 2009 03:20
in reply to "RE[7]: Only one choice for solid 3D under Linux - Nvidia"
RE[8]: Only one choice for solid 3D under Linux - Nvidia
by lemur2 on Fri 11th Sep 2009 03:28
in reply to "RE[7]: Only one choice for solid 3D under Linux - Nvidia"
Thats unhinged ranting, plain and simple.
Microsoft's marketing presentations are the "unhinged ranting".
http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS3377584759.html?kc=rss
The good news is that, buried in amongst all the attempted marketing FUD soundbites, at least the good side has got the OpenGL patents back.




Member since:
2007-02-17
How on earth is my saying effectively to "wait for the results of benchmark testing" supposed to be ranting?
Why all this irrational attack and vitriol? Did someone steal your lunch money?
Edited 2009-09-11 03:10 UTC