Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 24th Sep 2009 19:17 UTC
Internet Explorer Earlier this week, Google launched Chrome Frame, a plugin for Internet Explorer 6/7/8 which replaces the Trident rendering engine with Chrome's rendering and JavaScript engine for better performance and superior standards compliance. Microsoft has responded to this release, claiming it makes Internet Explorer less secure. Note: What database category do I put this in? Internet Explorer? Google? Choices, choices!
Thread beginning with comment 386118
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by Kroc
by tomcat on Thu 24th Sep 2009 23:43 UTC in reply to "Comment by Kroc"
tomcat
Member since:
2006-01-06

When someone fixes your crap for you, you thank them. And Google Chrome Frame is basically a copy of Chrome, sans, er... the chrome. It uses the same automatic, silent update system as Chrome. Any security flaws can literally be fixed for all users within 24 hours. You have no argument left Microsoft. Get your act together and instead of scaremongering, fix your crap.


Um, dude, Chrome doesn't "fix your crap for you." Chrome has an abysmal security record.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: Comment by Kroc
by lemur2 on Thu 24th Sep 2009 23:57 in reply to "RE: Comment by Kroc"
lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

Um, dude, Chrome doesn't "fix your crap for you." Chrome has an abysmal security record.


Um, dude, no.

http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/09/microsoft-google-chro...

After that though, Google made sure to stay on top of things, and it has paid off. In March 2009, for example, Chrome was the only browser left standing after day one of the famous Pwn2Own contest, where security researchers competed to exploit vulnerabilities in web browsers, while Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer were all successfully compromised. Microsoft argues that Chrome only remained unscathed because nobody attempted to exploit it, but the fact remains that none of the researchers had vulnerabilities for Chrome in mind before going into the contest.


Do try to keep up with things.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: Comment by Kroc
by tomcat on Fri 25th Sep 2009 04:29 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Kroc"
tomcat Member since:
2006-01-06

Do try to keep up with things.


Read for comprehension. I said that Chrome has an "abysmal security record." There's nothing in the paragraph that you provided that refutes the previous paragraph:

"Soon after Chrome was first released in September 2008, vulnerabilities were discovered and loudly trumpeted. The new browser was quickly labeled insecure days after it was made available, and remained so until a patched version was released."

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE[2]: Comment by Kroc
by 0brad0 on Fri 25th Sep 2009 00:20 in reply to "RE: Comment by Kroc"
0brad0 Member since:
2007-05-05


Chrome has an abysmal security record.


Because IE has such a stellar record. Keep smoking crack.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: Comment by Kroc
by tomcat on Fri 25th Sep 2009 17:21 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Kroc"
tomcat Member since:
2006-01-06

" Chrome has an abysmal security record.
Because IE has such a stellar record. Keep smoking crack. "

Thanks for the productive comment. I'm sure that increasing the malware attack surface area within IE6/7 is really going to help users. LOL!

Reply Parent Score: 2