Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 24th Sep 2009 13:35 UTC, submitted by Hiev
Mono Project If you don't like personal, blog-style reporting, you might want to skip this item. A few days ago, during a speech at Software Freedom Day in Boston, Richard Stallman has, at least in my book, crossed a line that I thought he would never cross.
Thread beginning with comment 386133
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
What about...
by eprubio on Fri 25th Sep 2009 00:30 UTC
Member since:

The "traitors" behind DotGNU?
Are they more or less traitors than Miguel?
Am I missing something?

Reply Score: 1

RE: What about...
by rirmak on Fri 25th Sep 2009 01:00 in reply to "What about..."
rirmak Member since:

You're missing the actual points against Mono.

Nobody is against it because they hate .NET as you are implying.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: What about...
by eprubio on Fri 25th Sep 2009 16:23 in reply to "RE: What about..."
eprubio Member since:

I still fail to understand the fuss...
Both Mono and DotGNU developers aim to provide a re-implementation of the .NET runtime and core libraries, or so I think. Mono seems to have a little bit more ambitious scope and their developers try to implement and/or repackage Microsoft libraries; they also implement several own libraries... Am I right so far?
Or is the blessing and support from Microsoft the cause of such wrath? The "I don't trust legally binding promises" holier-than-thou attitude? The "Miguel is chasing taillights" thought that ignores the same chasing from the DotGNU project? Something different from plain zealotry?

Reply Parent Score: 1