Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 24th Sep 2009 19:17 UTC
Internet Explorer Earlier this week, Google launched Chrome Frame, a plugin for Internet Explorer 6/7/8 which replaces the Trident rendering engine with Chrome's rendering and JavaScript engine for better performance and superior standards compliance. Microsoft has responded to this release, claiming it makes Internet Explorer less secure. Note: What database category do I put this in? Internet Explorer? Google? Choices, choices!
Thread beginning with comment 386423
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Microsoft is right
by lemur2 on Sat 26th Sep 2009 12:23 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Microsoft is right"
lemur2
Member since:
2007-02-17

Right, but if there is even one vulnerability in WebKit, it is a vulnerability that would not have been there had the WebKit plugin not been installed. That is the genius of Microsoft's statement. It doesn't matter that WebKit makes IE more secure than it is now.


Google disagree, perhaps unsurprisingly.

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9138522/Google_barks_back_at...

Google barks back at Microsoft over Chrome Frame security
Defends plug-in, says it makes IE more secure, not less.

Google hit back at Microsoft today, defending the security of its new Chrome Frame plug-in and claiming that the software actually makes Internet Explorer (IE) safer and more secure.


Microsoft's statement was in no way "genius", it was just self-serving FUD.

Edited 2009-09-26 12:24 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2