To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I'm sure there are quite a few OSNews readers who also read Groklaw.
The level of informed opinion & debate about this and other issues such as Software Patents is very high.
Because groklaw thinks Psystar is in the wrong and provides actual real legal reasons. This infuriates the people on OSNews who believe that they are correct and anything that disputes that is bad. How else could Thom's "analysis" be taken seriously by anyone who can actually think.
PJ has started writing drivel like this:
"This is what I saw from the beginning, that this is an attack on the GPL and on FOSS, using Apple as a smokescreen [...] I have believed from day one that Psystar's real goal is to undermine or destroy Open Source licenses, particularly the GPL. That was SCO's goal too."
The black helicopters are strong in that one. I'm sorry, but if you write unsubstantiated nonsense like that, then you lose credibility, no matter the good work she's done (and does).
She equates licenses like the GPL to EULAs, and as anyone with a sane mind will tell you, that's utter bullshit. I find it very, very odd that someone like PJ is writing such nonsense - in fact, I first thought her site had been hacked or something.
You just lost all your credibility. "
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_assertion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_belief





Member since:
2009-05-20
You just lost all your credibility.