Linked by Kevin Miller on Thu 15th Oct 2009 22:16 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 389771
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-08
For me the size of an OS matters ALOT, it should be as small as possible with an inventory of parts that should be justified. The BeOS/Haiku footprint is about 300MB. I remember that a QNX with minimal desktop and browser once fit into a floppy and made BeOS look bloated :-). I also fondly recall MacOS being quite petite too, 20MB or so plus apps.
Usually Win2K, XP, OSX, and Ubuntu usually fill out at around 8GB with about 40 apps each. Vista though needed a whopping 30GB.
For fun I recently tried microXP at 3GB and tinyVista at 8GB with same 40 apps. A more minimal microXP install with only FF, Winamp, VLC, Codewarrior, and a few others now easily fits in 1GB on a CF card, I can now work diskless if I want.
With no apps added, microXP actually fits in about 280MB (less than even Haiku) and tinyVista about 3GB. Both are far more snappy and usable than their legit versions, if only Microsoft had the ability to make such versions.
Although I will be trying out Haiku more and more, I think I can now fall back on microXP until Haiku is ready.