Linked by David Adams on Mon 19th Oct 2009 18:39 UTC
Graphics, User Interfaces OSNews takes a look at the technology powering the latest generation of touchscreen personal computers. Have the stars finally aligned to give the touch interface the combination of price, precision, sensitivity, and software support to make it attractive to the mainstream PC buyer? And if so, what does that mean for the elusive Tablet PC? We take a look at a Dell Studio One, which is powered by NextWindow's optical touch screen technology. (With video)
Thread beginning with comment 390137
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Applications
by AaronD on Tue 20th Oct 2009 07:00 UTC in reply to "Applications"
AaronD
Member since:
2009-08-19

It's not just about the tech, it's about the design of the software to use that tech, and I don't personally think that traditional desktop layout is appropriate or streamlined for a touch-based computer.

I agree with you. A tablet-type computer is a fundamentally different platform. Most attempts at a touch-based operating system have been an attempt to force the tablet platform into the PC "box."

I'm not saying to dumb down interfaces or anything like that, just that traditional layouts may not fit in this context.

Indeed, when that nut is cracked it could be the smartest interface devised. Personally, I think that fast, accurate, and fuss free handwriting recognition must be at the heart of the interface.

I'm surprised that Microsoft didn't try to ship their tabletop OS with the Studio One.

Edited 2009-10-20 07:03 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: Applications
by darknexus on Tue 20th Oct 2009 14:54 in reply to "RE: Applications"
darknexus Member since:
2008-07-15

Personally, I think that fast, accurate, and fuss free handwriting recognition must be at the heart of the interface.


While it would certainly be important for some situations, I don't think handwriting recognition is the end all of input methods as some seem to. There are some things, many things in fact, where even an on screen keyboard is faster than actually writing it out manually. It's certainly important, but I think the heart of the interface would be making the software and interaction with the screen streamlined. Hand writing is just an input method when you come right down to it, and the best recognition in the world might not make up for a bad interface in other areas.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Applications
by AaronD on Tue 20th Oct 2009 17:55 in reply to "RE[2]: Applications"
AaronD Member since:
2009-08-19

There are some things, many things in fact, where even an on screen keyboard is faster than actually writing it out manually.

Day-in, day-out I would rather type than write too. A two-handed keyboard is more efficient unless you just want to jot down a quick note. The problem with an on screen keyboard on a device the size of a tablet is that you would need to set it down to take full advantage of the keyboard. Plus, there are still a handful of people who don't know how to type. Maybe I'm being too inflexible, but I think a tablet will be at its best when it works like a clipboard.

Reply Parent Score: 1