Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 22nd Oct 2009 21:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 390732
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Ads are nice - but don't tell you the story
by tomcat on Sat 24th Oct 2009 01:57
in reply to "RE[3]: Ads are nice - but don't tell you the story"
My upgrade from Vista to W7 was very smooth. Almost everything worked, and the few things I had to fix were minor. It saved a great amount of time vs. reinstalling from scratch.
Glad to hear that! I never upgrade, myself. I always pave a machine and start from a fresh OS install.
This seems improbably high for a home user, as the upgrade cost would be much higher than the cost of replacing their entire computer, printer, and peripherals. If they _did_ replace all their gear to get W7, the benefits are unlikely to be limited to the improvements in W7 itself. That is, because of progress in the industry they will be getting a much faster machine, more capable accessories, etc.
Gartner is including costs for retraining workers from XP to Windows 7, and possibly amortizing the cost of porting legacy applications on a per-seat basis. It's hard to argue about those numbers, though, because every organization is different. So, it's entirely possible that per-seat costs could be much less.
As for home users, there's no way that the costs approach what Gartner estimated, but they said explicitly that the costs apply to businesses.




Member since:
2009-06-18
My upgrade from Vista to W7 was very smooth. Almost everything worked, and the few things I had to fix were minor. It saved a great amount of time vs. reinstalling from scratch.
This seems improbably high for a home user, as the upgrade cost would be much higher than the cost of replacing their entire computer, printer, and peripherals. If they _did_ replace all their gear to get W7, the benefits are unlikely to be limited to the improvements in W7 itself. That is, because of progress in the industry they will be getting a much faster machine, more capable accessories, etc.
That isn't always necessary though. As an example of low upgrade costs, my own machine is a couple of years old and started life running XP (though admittedly at the very tail end of XP). My printers are about 5y and 7y old and both work fine. My mice are 3-6y old, monitors are 1-4y old, external sound card is 2y old, USB video camera is 3y old, and my joystick is about 5y old. All of that gear, as well as all the internal hardware, work just fine, so there was no additional hardware cost to the upgrade.