Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 23:59 UTC
Windows Windows 7 has been out and about for little over a week now, and as it turns out, Microsoft's new baby is doing relatively well. That is, according to the figures by NetApplications: Windows 7 already reached the 3% mark this weekend, and is already closing in on the 4% mark.
Thread beginning with comment 392670
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Oh man!
by SaschaW on Tue 3rd Nov 2009 22:25 UTC
SaschaW
Member since:
2007-07-19

Why does everything here turn into a Windows - Linux kind of Jihad. Really annoying. I thought the article was about a good market penetration of Win 7 before and 1 week after its release. What does this have to do with Linux or how superior it is to whatever?

I think MS did rather well with this release. I am happily using it since their official beta. What surprised me the most was how well their beta and later RC actually worked. I always considered every MS release to be beta until it reached at least SP1. But 7 did well from the start. And I think that's the reason it has been adopted by so many people even before the official release.

RE: Oh man!
by ggeldenhuys on Wed 4th Nov 2009 07:28 in reply to "Oh man!"
ggeldenhuys Member since:
2006-11-13

What does this have to do with Linux or how superior it is to whatever?


The author of the OSNews article said that Linux is still stuck in the 1% mark whereas Win7 already surpassed it. Nobody can actually say what the linux market share is, simple because web browser identification can easily be faked to can access to crappy websites without being blocked. Also sales figures are not actuate because of the deployment nature of open-source software. Download counts are not accurate either, because I often download Linux from work, then distribute multiple copies of that ISO to friends and family so they don't have to download it.

Windows doesn't work that this, and is much easier to track that Linux. So doing marketshare analysis to impossible or simply very inaccurate.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[2]: Oh man!
by strcpy on Wed 4th Nov 2009 20:30 in reply to "RE: Oh man!"
strcpy Member since:
2009-05-20

Download counts are not accurate either, because I often download Linux from work, then distribute multiple copies of that ISO to friends and family so they don't have to download it.


Quite the contrary: download counts probably severely overestimate the amount of Linux users. People typically download multiple ISOs even if using just one. And they do that every six months or so.

Edited 2009-11-04 20:30 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2