Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 3rd Nov 2009 19:54 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Thread beginning with comment 392781
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: I don't get your whining
by RshPL on Wed 4th Nov 2009 14:14
in reply to "RE: I don't get your whining"
I suppose my comment wasn't geared towards the article itself but rather the general flavour of comments under this article. I'm all for free/(open source) software and I prefer it to any closed software when it delivers the functionality I need (none delivers the functionality of Skype), but reading through comments under this news one could gather what a terrible piece of software the Linux Skype client is, while I think it doesn't do much justice to it.
RE[3]: I don't get your whining
by WereCatf on Wed 4th Nov 2009 14:34
in reply to "RE[2]: I don't get your whining"






Member since:
2005-11-02
Who said anything about stability? Did the article say "We want better stability, so we're open sourcing the client UI?" No.
Stability, reliability, etc. may be incidental side effects of having many eyeballs debugging code, but it wont necessarily happen. And, importantly, that's not why we like open source. It's as much about freedom as it is about better software!
Not just FSF-style software Freedom, either. The ability to choose a desktop-integrated client is an example.
"Works for me and doesn't crash" isn't the ultimate justification for the existence of a piece of software!