Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Nov 2009 00:05 UTC, submitted by elsewhere
KDE We all know what KDE stands for, right? Unless you're new here, you'll know that it stands for the K Desktop Environment. While this certainly covers a large chunk of what KDE stands for, it has increasingly lost its meaning over the past few years. Consequently, the KDE team has decided to 'reposition' the KDE brand.
Thread beginning with comment 396627
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Ugh
by DigitalAxis on Thu 26th Nov 2009 17:33 UTC in reply to "RE: Ugh"
DigitalAxis
Member since:
2005-08-28

Well, if they have to call it a 'compilation' then it implies that the connection between the components is not obvious. That unfortunately tends to speak of 'stuff I threw together', but the KDE foundation wants to make it clear that KDE is a desktop AND libraries AND programs. You can use the programs without the desktop, and the libraries without the desktop. With this announcement, though, KDE looks less kohesive.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Ugh
by apoclypse on Thu 26th Nov 2009 19:40 in reply to "RE[2]: Ugh"
apoclypse Member since:
2007-02-17

Who the hell would want to use a KDE program outside of KDE? I mean most other environments have their own alternatives, sometimes they are even better. I definitely am not going to use Amarok on OSX, or Windows. I truly don't understand what would be the point.

They should have just stuck with what they had or they could just go right ahead with Plasma as the name for the whole thing.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: Ugh
by tosky on Fri 27th Nov 2009 10:13 in reply to "RE[3]: Ugh"
tosky Member since:
2009-08-05

Who the hell would want to use a KDE program outside of KDE?

This is your point of view. You will be surprised to discover how many people uses KDE applications under, let's say, GNOME. It's normal, they are all Xlib-based applications.
And yes, also under OSX or Windows.


I mean most other environments have their own alternatives, sometimes they are even better.

Sometimes worse.

I truly don't understand what would be the point. They should have just stuck with what they had or they could just go right ahead with Plasma as the name for the whole thing.

I do not understand your point: even without porting to other environments, KDE would be much more than Plasma. That's it.

Reply Parent Score: 4