To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The problem isn't just having a tool-shed or not, it's how well-organized the tool-shed is, and how easy it is to find the tool you want at any given time. It's fine to have lots of advanced and powerful features, but they need to be presented in such a way that the application remains easy to use in the likely-more-common simple use cases. Advanced features shouldn't be in the way.
That, I suppose, is my biggest problem with KDE. All that complexity might not be a bad thing in and of itself but. typically, I find that the abundance of options and features are not managed well, which can make it difficult to get into KDE (and KDE apps) and start using them for simple tasks. I really dread having to wade through four or five long, similarly-named option panels trying to find the one setting that I actually want; that happens to me a lot, when I try to use KDE.
Edited 2009-12-02 16:00 UTC




Member since:
2007-02-17
Point of philosophy here: I like to have a toolshed. It could well include a "first aid kit, full toolbox, kitchen sink, vacuum cleaner, 12 different screwdrivers and canister of gasoline".
If I want to drink a cup of coffee, I don't go into the toolshed to do so.
That does not mean that I don't want a toolshed at all. I'm not one to just drink coffee all the time.