To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
As questionable as the value of the Patriot Act is, in the grand scheme of things it will have little effect on your privacy.
The problem is - and I think Schmidt alludes to this - is that MANY, MANY parties log electronic communications, and any one of these can be an avenue back to authorities, fraudsters, your future employers, etc.
Take online backup sites - do you think your files are safe because they're encrypted? Nope - all the major online backup providers I checked retain the right to decrypt your data (although some will require a warrant).
The real test of privacy is if companies which offer anonymous/protected services are legally allowed to operate. Is it legal to sell encryption the government can't crack? Is it legal to pipe your access.log to /dev/null? In other words: is privacy illegal?
Uhh. Yes, it is completely legal to sell US citizens encryption the government can't crack. (You cannot export it)
In America our laws are setup where the government is granted specific rights, so until congress passes a law stating you cannot sell uncrackable encryption, it is legal.
Not understanding this difference is pretty much where every stupid fascist law we have comes from.
The real question is if it is legal for storage companies to use the key to your encrypted files except when a warrant is issued.





Member since:
2008-06-30
I advocate repealing the Patriot Act. It's refreshing to see an article from a non-political news source which shows the bad points of such legislation.