Linked by David Adams on Fri 11th Dec 2009 01:25 UTC
Privacy, Security, Encryption I was reminded of Sun Microsystems' Scott McNealy's infamous sound byte (used as the title of this article) when I read about Google CEO Eric Schmidt's foot-in-mouth moment during a recent CNBC interview (YouTube Link). Here's what Schmidt said: "I think judgment matters. If you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place. If you really need that kind of privacy, the reality is that search engines -- including Google -- do retain this information for some time and it's important, for example, that we are all subject in the United States to the Patriot Act and it is possible that all that information could be made available to the authorities."
Thread beginning with comment 399022
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Stasi
by bousozoku on Fri 11th Dec 2009 10:07 UTC in reply to "Stasi"
bousozoku
Member since:
2006-01-23

Today I was reading up again on the sequence of events as the Berlin wall fell and how the eastern bloc countries liberated themselves from their oppressive governments. I remember this all happening in 89, one country at a time but had forgotten the details.

Anyway the scary part was to come much later as citizens in each country eventually were able to read their secret files and no computers were used for any of this. Its scary to think we are all open books to some degree. It almost makes me want to go offline but then I'd be ignorant of the world events.


I vaguely remember some situation in the 1970s where the FBI had gotten involved with someone; pulled him out of bed during the night, and had more information on his life than he practically knew himself.

I only hope my life is more interesting to some government group than it is to me.

I'm so glad I don't live in Singapore. There was an incident over a year ago where a man and woman were arrested for being naked in their own home but the neighbour who photographed them was not arrested since he reported the crime. Yes, it's against the law to be naked in your home.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[2]: Stasi
by Ventajou on Fri 11th Dec 2009 16:49 in reply to "RE: Stasi"
Ventajou Member since:
2006-10-31

Do they take showers in underwear? Keep socks on when they have sex? Just curious...

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Stasi
by sbergman27 on Fri 11th Dec 2009 16:52 in reply to "RE[2]: Stasi"
sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

Do they take showers in underwear? Keep socks on when they have sex? Just curious...

I guess their clothes just have zippers in odd places.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Stasi
by bousozoku on Fri 11th Dec 2009 20:55 in reply to "RE[2]: Stasi"
bousozoku Member since:
2006-01-23

Do they take showers in underwear? Keep socks on when they have sex? Just curious...


I've asked about such things and no one will give me an answer. :-D

What's also strange is that the stores sell chewing gum, but it's against the law to chew gum in public--mostly because of the sticky nuisance on the ground but seriously, don't sell it, if people aren't allowed to chew it everywhere.

Reply Parent Score: 2