Linked by David Adams on Fri 11th Dec 2009 01:25 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 399145
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Good article - that is one of my very questions
by j.blechert on Tue 15th Dec 2009 04:39
in reply to "RE[5]: Good article - that is one of my very questions"
I have been using Wuala for some weeks now and they encrypt the files with my private key on my computer, it doesn't leave the computer as far as I can see, though of course that might just be an appearance and their license stuff might lie about the key staying on my computer and them not being able to decrypt my files.
RE[7]: Good article - nice
by jabbotts on Tue 15th Dec 2009 15:33
in reply to "RE[6]: Good article - that is one of my very questions"




Member since:
2007-09-06
The question first struck me with Amazon's storage service; do they store my data in such a way that it is an encrypted blob only accessible by me? The only way I would consider using one of these services would be as a duplicate of my backup archives in encrypted form. This on the basis that I'd be using it as an off-site backup since the service adds no advantage for me as an active data storage (I call those flashdrives or ye-old port 22 back at the ranch
).
My thinking the other way is that it's unlikely to be encrypted on the server side. Provided they can differentiate which files belong to which user; why add the expense of managing encryption beyond the ssl tunnel for the network traffic. I honestly would like to think that storage providers are setting up double-blind encrypted storage for the users but it's not likely. If the user didn't encrypt the files then I don't forsee them not being cleartext in the storage providers database.
(this is something I'd rather be corrected on rather than correct about though)