Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 6th Jan 2010 20:01 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 402942
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Comment by Kroc
by StaubSaugerNZ on Thu 7th Jan 2010 06:51
in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by Kroc"
There is nothing stopping somebody else from implementing COM on Linux or any other platform, it is just a specification for implementing interfaces to binary objects, no different from CORBA.
Except that COM represents the memory model of an i386 with the specific layout of little-endian MS VS C++. Not the same as cross-platform CORBA really. Certainly no where near as portable as SOAP webservices for remote operations. So, no wonder nobody wants to waste time implementing the archaic, obsolete and cumbersome COM system. Sure they could do it, but the community came up with and standardised vastly superior ways of doing IPC/RPC.
Edited 2010-01-07 06:52 UTC
RE[7]: Comment by Kroc
by BluenoseJake on Thu 7th Jan 2010 11:58
in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by Kroc"





Member since:
2005-08-11
There is nothing stopping somebody else from implementing COM on Linux or any other platform, it is just a specification for implementing interfaces to binary objects, no different from CORBA.