Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 11th Jan 2010 08:10 UTC
Multimedia, AV I followed the hype: Reddit, Slashdot's front page, months of thumbs up on my blog and various video forums by Linux users for OpenShot. Given that I'm longing for a usable Linux video editor since 2003, and given that OpenShot version 1.0 had just been released, I naturally gave it a go, by also downloading its provided dependencies on my Ubuntu Linux 9.10.
Thread beginning with comment 403889
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: A common problem
by DerGenosse on Wed 13th Jan 2010 16:45 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: A common problem"
DerGenosse
Member since:
2010-01-11

Yes. They do.

As I mentioned previously in this thread, a lot of the development probably stays in-house to give a "proprietary edge."

Seems like conjecture on your part to me. If people who worked at ILM wouldn't post at some VFX forums, we wouldn't know that ILM has abandoned their former in-house compositing system CompTime for their new in-house system Zeno. Yet, you claim to know that CinePaint is still used. Any proof?

By the way, ILM recently purchased a site-wide license for The Foundry's Nuke. A nice, proprietary compositing system that uses the FFmpeg libraries. I love Open Source!

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[5]: A common problem
by tupp on Wed 13th Jan 2010 19:29 in reply to "RE[4]: A common problem"
tupp Member since:
2006-11-12

Seems like conjecture on your part to me... you claim to know that CinePaint is still used. Any proof?

According to CinePaint, it still has studio development (scroll down to "CinePaint Secret Developers"): http://www.cinepaint.org/team.html
There is no reason to doubt this claim, as there is no reason for the studios to abandon such a versatile, valuable tool.

Do you have any proof against this claim? Seems like you are the one making conjecture.

By the way, CinePaint is not just used for VFX and animation, it's also used to touch-up regular footage (and in instances in which 32-bit color depth is needed).

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: A common problem
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Wed 13th Jan 2010 20:48 in reply to "RE[5]: A common problem"
Bill Shooter of Bul Member since:
2006-07-14

I wasn't aware it was used for VFX and animation. I would base my belief that its near abandoned based on the UI, and the lack of recent news,development and releases.

http://sourceforge.net/projects/cinepaint/

last file modified date of 2008-04-15


http://www.cinepaint.org/

last "News" on front page from over a year ago.

They do mention on the team page that studios develop it in secret before suddenly releasing it. So more accurately, its either being actively developed by studios secretly, or its been abandoned. No one will ever know what the fate of it is unless a new release appears from the sky.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: A common problem
by DerGenosse on Thu 14th Jan 2010 07:12 in reply to "RE[5]: A common problem"
DerGenosse Member since:
2010-01-11

According to CinePaint, it still has studio development (scroll down to "CinePaint Secret Developers"): http://www.cinepaint.org/team.html
There is no reason to doubt this claim, as there is no reason for the studios to abandon such a versatile, valuable tool.

Do you have any proof against this claim? Seems like you are the one making conjecture.

Sure. Cite a page that was last updated a year ago. Do you know someone at a studio who uses it? Has he told you so? Thought so.

You know what's big today? Integrating tools that once were separate into one big package. ILM's Zeno can do almost everything except modelling. And look no further than Nuke which is bought by studios left and right. It has a very nice Paint module that can be used precisely for those tasks -- like, for example, dust busting and wire removal -- where CinePaint would've been used. It also has a nice optional plugin called "Furnace", which provides advanced capabilities for automated wire removal, degraining, dirt removal, dust busting -- you name it.

Today you don't need to leave your compositor for tasks where you would have used an external paint application.

But hey, I'm probably just talking out of my rectum. And CinePaint is probably used this very moment by every VFX studio in the world. Too bad that nobody knows about it. But then, it may be pure imagination.

Reply Parent Score: 1