Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 19th Jan 2010 23:31 UTC, submitted by jebb
Thread beginning with comment 405067
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: License or die?
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Wed 20th Jan 2010 18:51
in reply to "RE[2]: License or die?"
True, but JLG's point is that the superior hardware and software triumph rather than licensing it or not. So the fact that the company is doing better cannot be attributed to the lack of licensing options for third party companies, but rather due to an improvement in the quality of their software and hardware.
RE[4]: License or die?
by nt_jerkface on Wed 20th Jan 2010 19:14
in reply to "RE[3]: License or die?"
So the fact that the company is doing better cannot be attributed to the lack of licensing options for third party companies, but rather due to an improvement in the quality of their software and hardware.
I'd add in marketing and image perception in there somewhere. They certainly improved their offerings from the days when their products were mostly bought by Mac club loyalists. XP stomped all over OS 9 and I'm still impressed by how they were able to recover. Everyone thought they would lose their #2 spot to Linux.





Member since:
2005-11-21
They could have the market share of BeOS if they don't! "
Their market share was headed towards BeOS when they had licensed it.
Now they've reversed the trend considerably.