Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 26th Jan 2010 00:04 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 406033
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
If that allows extension developers, like NoScript's author, to use those facilities to make their extension work like it did on Firefox good.
If Google's answer is... nah, you do not need NoScript after all... we have our own alternative... well I would stick with Firefox.
Bookmark tags (thanks SQLite
) + Mozilla Weave sync + Live Bookmarks + NoScript... the reasons why I still use Firefox over Chrome.
Edited 2010-01-26 12:47 UTC




Member since:
2007-06-22
http://hackademix.net/2009/12/10/why-chrome-has-no-noscript
Interesting. Judging by the feature list Google is going even one step further than Mozilla and is building something akin to Adblock Plus right into the core of Chrome, including an UI for filter management. Bonus points for extending the system to HTTP referrers and cookies. I'm curious now how the final implementation will turn out.