Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 26th Jan 2010 23:15 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 406173
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links




Member since:
2006-12-27
In an imaginary trial, the defense:
- Though my client has a long history of crimes against these people... motivation... opportunity... not changing it's mind in regard of the victims... etc. etc... May I remind you that evidence #16 (the weapon used) is not proven to be his creation?
- I ask this court to investigate a certain mr winchester (close linked with the gun) instead of losing time with the profiler and detectives hints. These, and the family victims, only harass my client and (in absence of hard rock solid evidence) should be severely punished for disturbing my client.
[ Is everybody drunk? ]
Edited 2010-01-27 15:40 UTC