Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Jan 2010 18:09 UTC
Apple Yes, yes, I apologise. After Kroc's story earlier today, and together with this one, we now have three stories in a row on the Ipad iPad (sorry, I can't ban camel case from OSNews just yet). So, what are we going to do? Predictions? Criticism? More details? No - I want to explain what I think the differences are between the introduction of the iPod and the iPhone, and that of the iPad.
Thread beginning with comment 406668
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: @haters
by macUser on Fri 29th Jan 2010 17:12 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: @haters"
macUser
Member since:
2006-12-15

I absolutely agree, though I'd like to clarify that what I mean by low powered also includes long battery life. The one thing I use my netbook for is exactly what my girlfriend would use the iPad for but instead of having to deal with the complex environment that is a Linux distribution (even if it's Ubuntu), she could use a completely integrated environment with a minimum amount of setup and maintenance.

Sure, the lock-in would drive me mad but as you quite rightly pointed out, I'm a consumer of a niche market. Hell, I build my own systems because I want them to be just so.

What do you think about Adobe porting Flash to the iPad? Do they already have an ARM port?


Apple would have to let them in the door... Or you'd have to hack the iPad, and I don't think Adobe would bet their business plan on that.

Reply Parent Score: 2