Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 29th Jan 2010 16:26 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 406702
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Is it a surprise since there are more x86 machines now?
by nt_jerkface on Fri 29th Jan 2010 21:53
in reply to "Is it a surprise since there are more x86 machines now?"
Captain Obvious is working in the Microsoft Marketing department with this release.
Upgrading a virtual monopoly provides huge results. That's not exactly a surprise.
Upgrading a virtual monopoly provides huge results. That's not exactly a surprise.
Hmmm I would have agreed in 2002 but now that Apple has 12% share in the US I'd call it a duopoly. It's still an open market, IBM could spend a billion and clone OSX but like other tech giants they don't care about the desktop.
RE[2]: Is it a surprise since there are more x86 machines now?
by bousozoku on Sat 30th Jan 2010 02:18
in reply to "RE: Is it a surprise since there are more x86 machines now?"
Hmmm I would have agreed in 2002 but now that Apple has 12% share in the US I'd call it a duopoly. It's still an open market, IBM could spend a billion and clone OS X but like other tech giants they don't care about the desktop.
That would be inaccurate. IBM care plenty about the desktop, but management there don't understand it at all, especially when there isn't any IBM hardware involved.





Member since:
2006-01-23
Captain Obvious is working in the Microsoft Marketing department with this release.
Upgrading a virtual monopoly provides huge results. That's not exactly a surprise. In its day, wouldn't a Commodore 64 upgrade have been huge? How about a CP/M-80 upgrade or a combined CP/M-80/86/68000 upgrade?
It's only been since WinNT and Win95 that the majority of people started thinking about computers for home and usually, those machines were so outdated by the time the next release came that they couldn't easily upgrade.
Further, Microsoft can claim the number, but shouldn't they subtract all the Vista upgrades since it took them all this time to correct their mistakes?