Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 29th Jan 2010 22:10 UTC, submitted by twickline
Linux The Bordeaux Technology Group released Bordeaux 2.0.0 for Linux today. "Bordeaux 2.0.0 marks major progress over older releases. With version 2.0.0 and onward we bundle our own Wine build and many tools and libraries that Wine depends upon. With this release we bundle Wine 1.1.36, Cabextract, Mozilla Gecko, Unzip, Wget and other support libraries and tools. We have improved support for Microsoft Office 2007 (Word, Excel and PowerPoint) and preliminary support for Internet Explorer 7 in this release, there has also been many small bug fixes and tweaks on the back-end."
Thread beginning with comment 406815
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Bordeaux?
by strcpy on Sat 30th Jan 2010 03:52 UTC
strcpy
Member since:
2009-05-20

Bordeaux?

Never even heard of it.

Why is this newsworthy?

Reply Score: 3

RE: Bordeaux?
by t3RRa on Sat 30th Jan 2010 05:44 in reply to "Bordeaux?"
t3RRa Member since:
2005-11-22

I just thought the same.

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE: Bordeaux?
by ricegf on Sat 30th Jan 2010 11:21 in reply to "Bordeaux?"
ricegf Member since:
2007-04-25

You only want OSnews to publish news that you already know? That's truly odd...

Reply Parent Score: 10

RE[2]: Bordeaux?
by KAMiKAZOW on Sat 30th Jan 2010 15:19 in reply to "RE: Bordeaux?"
KAMiKAZOW Member since:
2005-07-06

You only want OSnews to publish news that you already know? That's truly odd...

OSNews could've made that a news item with a "Read More" link that shortly explains what that is.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE: Bordeaux?
by OSGuy on Sat 30th Jan 2010 23:25 in reply to "Bordeaux?"
OSGuy Member since:
2006-01-01

OSNews could have simply given us a brief explanation like a line or two detailing what this product is rather than only liking to their web site. Right after "The Bordeaux Technology Group released Bordeaux 2.0.0 for Linux today." They could have added: "Bordeaux is..." etc.

If the name doesn't ring a bell, at least tell us what it is. Same here, I have never heard of this distribution before.

Edited 2010-01-30 23:28 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Bordeaux?
by twickline on Sun 31st Jan 2010 00:26 in reply to "RE: Bordeaux?"
twickline Member since:
2005-12-31

Well You have now ;)

Tom

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Bordeaux?
by bugjacobs on Sun 31st Jan 2010 22:57 in reply to "RE: Bordeaux?"
bugjacobs Member since:
2009-01-03

Even I have heard of Bordeaux, its a wine ! :-) AND a Wine-is-not-an-emu flavour.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE: Bordeaux?
by tylerdurden on Sun 31st Jan 2010 00:30 in reply to "Bordeaux?"
tylerdurden Member since:
2009-03-17

... and they say irony is dead. Good grief, do you know what "news" means?

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE: Bordeaux?
by hayalci on Sun 31st Jan 2010 23:11 in reply to "Bordeaux?"
hayalci Member since:
2005-07-15

The same issue from 6 months ago
http://www.osnews.com/story/21734/Bordeaux_1_8_for_FreeBSD_Released

I even commented the same complaint
http://www.osnews.com/permalink?370611

Perhaps Bordeaux releases should include a descriptive sentence at the beginning.

Edited 2010-01-31 23:12 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1