Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 31st Jan 2010 14:20 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Thread beginning with comment 407083
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-05-18
The reality is that developers will use the format that has the biggest support. So, for the moment it can go either way ... as always it depends on which codec(s) Internet Explorer will support.

What terrifies me is that Microsoft will probably support whatever codecs are installed on each system. This is bad news - it reminds of the times before Flash video when you could barely see any video, because the browsers would embed an ugly WMP control which barely played anything.
The result? The video tag will go nowhere, and 10 years from now we will still be using Flash video. Developers will use something only if they can be sure that it's supported on 90%+ of the machines. Realistically speaking I can't imagine how could that happen ...