Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 31st Jan 2010 14:20 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Thread beginning with comment 407096
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I really doubt it is a cost issue with Google. With storage costs so low they could store everything in triplicate and not break a sweat. The reason mentioned back when Theora was abandoned as part of the HTML5 standard was because Google felt that Theora does not meet the quality-per-bit requirement of a site like youtube.
This has since been debated back and forth. And I am not saying they are right, just saying that was their official rationale for using h264.




Member since:
2005-11-14
one thing ive seen missing is why google support h264:
they reencoded all their videos for the iPhone in h264 some years ago. they prolly have contracts with apple for this.
they do not want to have to store both h264 and theora versions. it takes a while to convert, but it works (they keep the raws). But keeping everything twice has a cost as well. Overall its a bad choice for them.
it has nothing to do with the technical merits of h264