Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 1st Feb 2010 21:42 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless While we're all busy weeting ourselves or getting our knickers in twists over Apple's iPad, we'd almost forget that this other company had already announced a similar product two months ago. Fusion Garage's CEO has given a number of updates on the Joo Joo, while also filing its motion to dismiss the court case started by TechCrunch.
Thread beginning with comment 407323
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Not going to buy a Joo Joo
by Spinfusor on Mon 1st Feb 2010 23:05 UTC in reply to "Not going to buy a Joo Joo"
Member since:

I have a question for you: Why did a former lawyer not create a legal agreement?

Michael Arrington's brainstorming and "original development" amounts to wanting to create a cheap, browser-centric tablet. Fusion Garage didn't steal anything; there was nothing to steal. Arrington's only significant contribution was hype.

Did you bother to read the Engadget article linked to? Arrington's a bad journalist, a terrible lawyer, and has no case.

Edited 2010-02-01 23:06 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

Bill Shooter of Bul Member since:

True. All true, but that doesn't make fusion garage any less of a slime ball operation. Not getting a thin dime from me or any one I have any influence with.

Reply Parent Score: 2