Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 2nd Feb 2010 23:25 UTC, submitted by Chicken Blood
Apple The beauty of the internet is such that every opinion has become worthless; this goes doubly so for those with publish buttons on (relatively, we're humble) major websites. For every opinion, there's a matching counter-opinion, and that's great. Yesterday, we linked to an article by Mark Pilgrim about tinkerers and the iPad, and of course, someone was bound to disagree with that one.
Thread beginning with comment 407560
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Now that's Sniveling!
by _xmv on Wed 3rd Feb 2010 10:56 UTC in reply to "RE: Now that's Sniveling! "
_xmv
Member since:
2008-12-09


All well and good, but they're not really idealists-- they are reactionaries. The direction that Apple is moving is a welcome change after nearly two decades of stagnation in personal computing. It's a new computing model and just because Apple's version of it is closed doesn't mean that being closed is inherent to the model.

In other words, if you don't like what Apple is doing, then show us something else.

what the hell are you talking about?
how is the iPad different ? you've never seen a tablet pc before? Cause they've been around for 10 years, mind you. All there is, is an Apple marketing head on top of it. That's no new computing model. Neither is making it entierely DRM controlled and closed.
Have you seen the anti-intel TPM video? that's the same story, except they don't even need to cover it under the claims of greater security anymore.

Heck, its even using a 3 years old OS and apps.

Such people as you, which are called sheeps, are the reason for most things going wrong in this world. Time to get off your eye protections and look around.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Now that's Sniveling!
by cb_osn on Wed 3rd Feb 2010 11:30 in reply to "RE[2]: Now that's Sniveling! "
cb_osn Member since:
2006-02-26

what the hell are you talking about?
how is the iPad different ? you've never seen a tablet pc before? Cause they've been around for 10 years, mind you.

Yes, they have been around for a while. And yes, they've been a monumental failure because they've been shackled to a decades old interface paradigm that simply doesn't work for a touch based device. The iPad is different because it tosses the old stuff out the window and provides a platform for building software that is designed from the ground up for that form factor and interaction model. The difference is hugely significant.

Have you seen the anti-intel TPM video? that's the same story, except they don't even need to cover it under the claims of greater security anymore.

Oh please. I'm well aware of the implications of a DRM controlled future and I don't wish for it anymore than you do. I praise Apple's move with the iPad because it will shatter long held expectations about what computing is and possibly can be-- not for their creation of a closed ecosystem. I fully expect that once the hysterics die down, everyone will see the chasm that they've opened and that new ideas, both proprietary and open, will come forth.

Such people as you, which are called sheeps, are the reason for most things going wrong in this world. Time to get off your eye protections and look around.

Judging from your post, I'm sure you don't have the depth of understanding to make such statements.

Reply Parent Score: 2

Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

And yes, they've been a monumental failure because they've been shackled to a decades old interface paradigm that simply doesn't work for a touch based device.


Uhm, special touch/tablet interfaces have been designed ages ago, and even brought to market.

http://www.guidebookgallery.org/books/thepowerofpenpoint/chapter2

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Now that's Sniveling!
by _xmv on Wed 3rd Feb 2010 15:57 in reply to "RE[3]: Now that's Sniveling! "
_xmv Member since:
2008-12-09


Yes, they have been around for a while. And yes, they've been a monumental failure because they've been shackled to a decades old interface paradigm that simply doesn't work for a touch based device. The iPad is different because it tosses the old stuff out the window and provides a platform for building software that is designed from the ground up for that form factor and interaction model. The difference is hugely significant.

they're ipod touch with big screens. 3 years old design.


I praise Apple's move with the iPad because it will shatter long held expectations about what computing is and possibly can be-- not for their creation of a closed ecosystem.

but that is the point and the issue. i'm pretty sure everyones happy if apple issues great products (not that i think the ipad is great in itself - but thats a different subject)

apple marketing is very efficient. everyone *knows* that despite the ipad not being exceptionally useful (again, just like other tablet pcs in fact:p ), its going to sell. most don't know why they buy it other than "it looks cool, it sounds cool and you know, must have one"

imagine, if everyone has an ipad, and an iphone, it does not matter, if some open source or just "open" solutions gather up. 99% will be apple, closed, and most people will go that way, and get used to have no such freedom.


Judging from your post, I'm sure you don't have the depth of understanding to make such statements.

what you mean here is "you disagree with me so you canno't be correct"
just try to "think different" as you fav company used to say, without thinking about winning an internet argument. or is it you, who do not have enough depth.. or here, self-confidence to try? sure takes more effort than reading pre-conceived ideas, which most are not willing to make.

and that defines my ironical "sheep" to compare with your own renaming of a section of the population. Maybe you'll get my point, now.

Reply Parent Score: 1