Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 12th Feb 2010 22:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 409131
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
So where did you get the information we're supposed to read the graph by subtracting the bottom neighboring edge from the top edge for each division? I could not find anything in the original article indicating that.
(and it would seem irrational to make a graph like that unless they wanted to deceptively inflate Office profits by 300 - 400% for example)
RE[3]: server and tools
by umccullough on Sat 13th Feb 2010 02:07
in reply to "RE[2]: server and tools"
(and it would seem irrational to make a graph like that unless they wanted to deceptively inflate Office profits by 300 - 400% for example)
It's a common graph type (apparently called a "Stacked Area Chart")... so call it irrational if you want, but it's not uncommon.
Also important to note, Microsoft didn't create this graph.
Edited 2010-02-13 02:23 UTC





Member since:
2006-01-26
Again, you're reading the chart wrong. It consistently makes less than Windows, it's just a thin strip on top of the windows profit there.