Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 23rd Feb 2010 20:40 UTC, submitted by hotice
Thread beginning with comment 410806
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Cool idea, but bad implementation
by vivainio on Wed 24th Feb 2010 19:42
in reply to "Cool idea, but bad implementation"
Now, with this release, all these issues are still there (although it feels a bit more polished), but it is even slower! It is completely unusable (i915 GPU, in case it matters).
It's quite unusable on my laptop as well (using nvidia blob, even).
I have a feeling that it is their large reliance on JavaScript, instead of using something like Vala or Genie that would be faster and still relatively easy to develop.
The slowness has nothing to do with Javascript, it's all about what gets accelerated and how well. The hard work is handled by Clutter.
RE[2]: Cool idea, but bad implementation
by Elv13 on Thu 25th Feb 2010 01:25
in reply to "RE: Cool idea, but bad implementation"




Member since:
2009-10-04
I tried the last version of GNOME-Shell, and I thought it was a very cool idea. The only problems were that:
* Text in some places was HUGE (i.e. like 500pt or something like that!)
* There was no way to move the panel to the bottom of the screen (which makes it pointless to use Chrome, the tabs are the only reason I use it over Firefox)
* It was kind of slow
* It was lacking polish
Now, with this release, all these issues are still there (although it feels a bit more polished), but it is even slower! It is completely unusable (i915 GPU, in case it matters).
I have a feeling that it is their large reliance on JavaScript, instead of using something like Vala or Genie that would be faster and still relatively easy to develop.