Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 3rd Mar 2010 20:43 UTC, submitted by kragil
Thread beginning with comment 412215
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I agree, a GUI should really be "hardly existant" so that you don't notice it really; I also hate gradients and glowy/glossy stuff. But in the above example, many widgets didn't even have a border, which is the wrong kind of "hardly existant" for me
The second example is really better. Personally, I think the Windows 95 GUI was the cleanest GUI that I ever used. Under Gnome, I use a customized version of "Raleigh" (only the colors are customized a bit) for the widgets and a CDE-lookalike for the window borders.




Member since:
2007-11-29
Maybe it's beautiful, but it's not very usable*. Many widgets can't be clearly differentiated from each other. Some people might be willing to get used to it (because they like the looks), but it's nothing for the masses. It reminds me of the many WinAmp skins, they place nice pictures behind the GUI, but the GUI itself becomes hardly existent.
* from a pure usability point of view