Linked by kloty on Tue 6th Apr 2010 21:22 UTC
Editorial A few years ago I wrote on OSNews several articles (1,2) about workstations. After three years I had to stop, because there were no workstations left on the market, they became legacy and were not sold any more. Now with the rise of mobile devices with touchscreen and wireless network connectivity virtually everywhere, the question becomes valid, what will happen with the desktop computers, are they still needed, or will they follow the workstations on their way to computer museums?
Thread beginning with comment 417433
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Desktop vs Workstation
by Delgarde on Tue 6th Apr 2010 22:52 UTC in reply to "Desktop vs Workstation"
Delgarde
Member since:
2008-08-19

What is the difference between a Workstation and a Desktop, really?


I think that the two terms come from different backgrounds. 'Desktop' being from a PC background, contrasting with 'Laptop' or 'Notebook'. And 'Workstation' being from the world of Unix (and predecessors), contrasting with thin terminals or servers.

These days, the implication is that a workstation is a serious, powerful machine - high spec, big screen (or screens), etc. Contrasted with the kind of machine used by normal people - call center workers, secretaries, etc.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: Desktop vs Workstation
by steogede2 on Wed 7th Apr 2010 02:25 in reply to "RE: Desktop vs Workstation"
steogede2 Member since:
2007-08-17

UNIX would probably have been a key differentiator, as would price. In the hay day of SGI etc., a workstation may have cost 5 to 50 times as much as PC.

Reply Parent Score: 1