Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 8th Apr 2010 22:38 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 417895
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-08-19
Nope. The wording is that "Applications must be originally written in Objective-C, C, C++", etc. Emphasis on "originally" - it's clearly the same intent as the GPL clause that defines the code as the stuff human developers actually work on, not the output of some processing step.
The purpose clearly is to force people to use Apple's APIs, to make it harder to build a product that can run on competing platforms as well.