Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 14th Apr 2010 11:50 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 418964
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Yeah, I don't know about that
by Tuishimi on Wed 14th Apr 2010 20:12
in reply to "Yeah, I don't know about that"
RE: Yeah, I don't know - Bingo; "sell"
by jabbotts on Wed 14th Apr 2010 21:03
in reply to "Yeah, I don't know about that"
RE: Yeah, I don't know about that
by marafaka on Thu 15th Apr 2010 13:13
in reply to "Yeah, I don't know about that"
jack_perry: "I wouldn't call that piracy"
It doesn't matter what anybody calls piracy as it is not a matter of oppinion but a matter of risk and profit. It is about breaking the agreements that aren't ours in the first place and everybody knows that it mostly works.
This certanly breaks some business schemes but every regulation does it too. But it doesn't mean anything as there are always ways around it.
As an Amiga developer I was always told "nahnah, somebody is selling your goods there for nahnah and so" but as long as I got the amount of cash I liked it was allright. And I wouldn't use the legal weaponry against one of my clients anyway. Maybe if I was a little braindamaged and got out of other ideas 




Member since:
2005-07-06
This hasn't worked too well in many markets. A lot of Amiga developers, for example, were pretty open about their soreness at what piracy was doing to them: driving them out of the Amiga market.
It also strikes me that "piracy" here is used very, very broadly. It's one thing to share an electronic document with someone so that they can borrow it temporarily; I wouldn't call that piracy (although some extremists might).
However, when you copy and sell such a document, as goes on in many places, that's clearly piracy--and although one might spin this as benefiting the larger economy because there is more "economic activity", it remains theft, and will have negative effects.