Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 21st Apr 2010 19:33 UTC, submitted by ozonehole
Thread beginning with comment 420139
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by Licaon_Kter
by Karitku on Thu 22nd Apr 2010 08:28
in reply to "Comment by Licaon_Kter"
1 year ealier: http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/when-fair-use-fairly
Unfortunatly article is all about technical mambo jambo. Real issue is this, if someone makes video(lets call it Burt) out of small piece of video (lets call this Lester) that is made by another person and maker of Burt gets money from showing Burt is it fair use? Shouldn't maker of Lester get some part of money from Burt maker? If you look these Hitler videos clearly it might look like that there isn't any money on play, but there is actually alot. Even if the maker of Burt don't get any money the site that hosts Burt might get, is it fair for maker of Lester?
RE[2]: Comment by Licaon_Kter
by Licaon_Kter on Thu 22nd Apr 2010 15:20
in reply to "RE: Comment by Licaon_Kter"
Real issue is this, if someone makes video(lets call it Burt) out of small piece of video (lets call this Lester) that is made by another person and maker of Burt gets money from showing Burt is it fair use?
but this is not the issue here, the makers of the Hitler vs. PS3, Hitler vs. GTA4 tech issues, Hitler vs. nVidia Fermi etc don't make any money, the hosting service does through ads... and that's a different thing
moar: http://ideas.4brad.com/studio-does-content-id-takedown-my-hitler-vi...




Member since:
2010-03-19
1 year ealier: http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/when-fair-use-fairly