To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
So we have three data points:
OpenOffice is written in C/C++ and is slow.
ThinkFree Office is written in Java and is fast.
Microsoft Office is written in C/C++ and is fast.
A statistician would say: you don't have enough data to make a valid judgement.
An engineer would say: the algorithms of the software likely matter less than the language.
A programmer would say: C/C++ must be better!
The statistician is, of course, the one whose right, but the engineer's conclusion is useful, while the programmer's conclusion is completely in left-field...
"And Microsoft Office is better than ThinkFree..."
ThinkFree is almost as fast as Microsoft Office. And it costs $45 instead of $300 for Office 2003 Standard.
But that's not the point. The point is that it is an example where a similar application written in C++ performs far worse than one written in Java. So your argument is void.





Member since:
2005-10-08
"I have yet to find a Java application that doesn't run like crap, dog slow, etc. When you use a Java app, you know it, because they just suck so bad it's obvious."
ThinkFree Office blows OpenOffice away when it comes to performance. It starts up many times faster, and is significantly faster when using it as well.
And guess what? ThinkFree is written entirely in Java.