Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 26th Apr 2010 10:01 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 420827
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Nitpick: Should have asked OR instead of AND
by viator on Mon 26th Apr 2010 18:20
in reply to "RE[3]: Nitpick: Should have asked OR instead of AND"
All the app store is is a repository of applications that apple controls the difference between the linux repos and apples way of doing things is that apple will not let you add any third party repos to your own machine by way of leaving out that functionality in their app store (installer). And you cant install software any other way on these machines (unlike linux)
I would have no problem with apple having an app store for osx but at the VERY LEAST allow for third party repos!
Edited 2010-04-26 18:22 UTC




Member since:
2006-03-30
This is really not that hard of an issue to solve. You just have two classifications of Apps. "Apple Certified" Apps and Non-Certified Apps. In order to install the latter, you have to first enable them to show up and then click through a big, "AT YOUR OWN RISK" popup before installing. The average mom and pop user would never bother, but then again, they probably wouldn't install too many non-big-name apps.
Apple could take their sweet time reviewing apps for the Certified section, and use some kind of user feedback (like a "report malware" button) in the Non-Certified section to give them a heads up regarding dodgy apps. Easy.
I agree that, in all likelihood, some kind of "App Store" is coming to OS X in the future.