Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 26th Apr 2010 18:38 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 420960
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Bring Back the Shielding
by Nathan O. on Tue 27th Apr 2010 16:38
in reply to "RE: Bring Back the Shielding"
RE[3]: Bring Back the Shielding
by Toonie on Tue 27th Apr 2010 17:50
in reply to "RE[2]: Bring Back the Shielding"
RE[2]: Bring Back the Shielding
by Zbigniew on Wed 28th Apr 2010 21:49
in reply to "RE: Bring Back the Shielding"
RE[3]: Bring Back the Shielding
by Doc Pain on Thu 29th Apr 2010 19:32
in reply to "RE[2]: Bring Back the Shielding"
OK, two more words: ZIP and LS - both well-protected, and of capacity over 100 MB each.
Oh, you mean the one with the ongoing media and drive deadjustment "hardware virus"? :-)
Still, 100 MB is a capacity that doesn't impress anyone today. Even 10 times as much - 1 GB - is considered "too few" today...




Member since:
2006-10-08
One word: MiniDisc.
The disc is inside a kind of caddy, and it's almost the (handy) size of a 3.5" floppy disk (in fact, it's a bit smaller, a size between the mentioned disk and a CF card). So both data carrier protection and form factor are quite intelligent.
With today's DVD drives, you really wonder why you need a drive the size of a whole computer (like a Mac Mini) to read a medium the size of a 5.25" floppy that hard unreadable when the surface (on the downside) is minimally scratched... or when it chemically or biologically dissolves into funny colours and patterns. :-)