To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Actually it is discretionary. If someone stole my hypothetical phone that I built and programmed and blogged about it, the police would not go and break down their door. Only when you have a multi-billion dollar company will they do that.
Don't you think that individuals should be more important than corporations in the law?
Yes, but apparently Apple is.
You can argue sometimes corporations should be more important. Assuming a crime has been committed, then if the DA doesn't do anything, the area becomes less valuable as a place for companies to do business. You lose your one phone, but thousands lose income as businesses decide to move projects away or not start new business in the area due to their property not being protected. Why is your phone more important than thousands of families survival???
How is Apple above the law?? That would imply Apple committed a crime and were not prosecuted. Are you arguing that Apple directly told the DA what to do, and that Apple IS the government? Isn't it more likely that politically, there is pressure to keep the area friendly to high tech R&D? Isn't this the same area that has Intel, Google, and other major tech companies?





Member since:
2006-01-16
We happen to live in a society governed by law. It's application isn't discreationary. The DA decides what is pursued what is not.
Gizmodo is not above the law.