Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 28th Apr 2010 14:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 421255
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I think tomtom will attest to that with the FAT32 problems they had. They eventually managed to solve it, but all companies use patents in a bad way most of the time.
TomTom could have used a Linux kernel that did not violate Microsoft's FAT patents (which, BTW, is not a patent for FAT itself, but rather a patent for a method of writing both a long filename (LFN) and a short filename (the old 8.3 style filename) for the same file on a FAT32 filesystem).
See here:
http://www.osnews.com/permalink?421336
However, Microsoft probably offered TomTom a deal such that it was far easier, quicker and cheaper to settle out of court with Microsoft rather than take this to court.
I'd imagine that most of these issues are similar. Linux doesn't infringe but it is easier and cheaper to settle with Microsoft out of court than it would be to take it to court.




Member since:
2006-07-25
I think tomtom will attest to that with the FAT32 problems they had. They eventually managed to solve it, but all companies use patents in a bad way most of the time.