Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 29th Apr 2010 18:30 UTC
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu It's that time of year again: a new Ubuntu release (or Kubuntu, if that's your thing). Canonical has just released Ubuntu 10.04, Lucid Lynx. This is a long term support release, meaning its supported period is far longer than that of normal releases. It comes with the latest and greatest the Free software world has to offer, while also adding some Ubuntu-specific features, of course.
Thread beginning with comment 421514
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Boot times
by darknexus on Thu 29th Apr 2010 19:19 UTC in reply to "Boot times"
darknexus
Member since:
2008-07-15

Yes it boots fast, but honestly I don't see what all the fuss is about. It boots five seconds faster, so what? I'm honestly asking here since I don't get it, exactly what is the big obsession with boot times? Maybe it's just the way I use a computer, but I rarely reboot my desktop or laptop. In the case of my laptop (well, netbook) I put it into suspend, and resuming from that is quicker than any cold boot. It's not like that extra five or so seconds is going to make or break whatever you're doing.

Reply Parent Score: 9

RE[2]: Boot times
by Superb on Thu 29th Apr 2010 19:30 in reply to "RE: Boot times"
Superb Member since:
2010-02-20

Well, after seeing some benchmarks I can definitely say it's not "just 5 seconds" faster... Much more than that. :O

And to be honest, it's not just the boot times that attract me. Looking at the new features page*, the whole OS looks very modern and slick.

* http://www.ubuntu.com/products/whatisubuntu/1004features

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Boot times
by darknexus on Thu 29th Apr 2010 19:34 in reply to "RE[2]: Boot times"
darknexus Member since:
2008-07-15

No one's arguing it's a good os... at least not yet. Patience, they'll start soon. ;) But I timed my machine, and it was only five seconds faster, so maybe for some reason I just didn't have as slow of a boot on previous releases as others did. Even so, I still don't get the boot time fixation, and it's not just with Linux. Well, I get it in Vista's case since it was dog slow to boot, but in all the other cases I just don't get what a few seconds is in the scheme of things.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Boot times
by ggeldenhuys on Thu 29th Apr 2010 22:09 in reply to "RE: Boot times"
ggeldenhuys Member since:
2006-11-13

I'm with you on this one. My desktop which I use at work and do all my software development on has avg uptimes of 30-60 days between reboots.

As for my laptop at home. I suspend to disk and it starts up pretty instant when I lift the lid.

Linux is rock solid and hardly ever requires a reboot - unlike other OSes. ;-)

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: Boot times
by jokkel on Fri 30th Apr 2010 07:56 in reply to "RE[2]: Boot times"
jokkel Member since:
2008-07-07


Linux is rock solid and hardly ever requires a reboot - unlike other OSes. ;-)

I use all of the 3 big OSs. And I think I have to reboot my Ubuntu machine the most often. The reason is, that software updates ask me to do it. X.org locking up is also not that rare. And restarting X is like a reboot to me.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Boot times
by lemur2 on Thu 29th Apr 2010 23:12 in reply to "RE: Boot times"
lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

Yes it boots fast, but honestly I don't see what all the fuss is about. It boots five seconds faster, so what? I'm honestly asking here since I don't get it, exactly what is the big obsession with boot times? Maybe it's just the way I use a computer, but I rarely reboot my desktop or laptop. In the case of my laptop (well, netbook) I put it into suspend, and resuming from that is quicker than any cold boot. It's not like that extra five or so seconds is going to make or break whatever you're doing.


At work the desktop Windows machine takes well over three minutes to boot. Each morning I switch it on and I make myself a cup of coffe rather than waiting for it. If I am hosting a meeting in the meeting room, and another meeting has just gone before mine, I find it vey embarassing taking five minutes of meeting time just to get a Windows computer up and running and working with the meeting room projector.

I had occasion to restore Windows 7 on a Toshiba laptop recently. After the install of the bare Windows OS, which itself required a couple of re-boots, the Toshiba restore setup went into a cycle of "Configuring System" (which was actually installing machine-specific drivers), and after each new driver was installed, the machine automatically re-booted. Then I installed Windows security Essentials, and then did a complete Windows Update, and then I installed a few applications which also required re-boot. All up the entire process must have required about twenty re-boots. It took many, many hours, and it was a thoroughly harrowing experience.

I installed Kubuntu Lucid on my own main desktop last week. It took two re-boots in total ... once to boot the liveCD, and a second re-boot to boot the newly-installed OS from the hard drive. The entire install, from go to whoa, took less than 15 minutes.

Not being made of money, to reduce the electricity consumption I turn off my Kubuntu home machine after each time I use it. After all, it takes only 15 seconds from turning it on again before it is fully ready for use on the next occasion. The only downside is that there is no time to make myself a coffee.

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[3]: Boot times
by phoenix on Fri 30th Apr 2010 04:22 in reply to "RE[2]: Boot times"
phoenix Member since:
2005-07-11

Exactly, shorter boot times are only important on OSes that have to reboot a lot. ;) Bragging about getting a Linux boot to under 10 seconds, which might save you 5 minutes in a year, is like bragging you got the top speed of an F1 car 10% higher, which might shave 5 minutes off your race time all season. ;)

Now, getting a Windows system to boot in 10 seconds would be something worth bragging about. That would save you 15-20 minutes a week. ;)

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: Boot times
by google_ninja on Fri 30th Apr 2010 13:22 in reply to "RE: Boot times"
google_ninja Member since:
2006-02-05

. In the case of my laptop (well, netbook) I put it into suspend


I would love to do that, but the last two versions, suspend has been totally broken for my laptop. so I appreciate the really fast boot ;-)

Reply Parent Score: 2