Linked by Kroc Camen on Thu 29th Apr 2010 23:04 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 421708
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Where are the rants against Google?
by nt_jerkface on Fri 30th Apr 2010 08:58
in reply to "RE[3]: Where are the rants against Google?"
So all it requires is Google to re-encode their videos, probably with VP8.
It is estimated that Google has in excess of one million servers. Google could arguably be able to re-encode on million of its most popular videos within a few minutes, and another million within a few more minutes, and tens of millions of its most popular videos within an hour.
Where is the problem here?
Of course it is technically possible for them to do it, but they don't want to. They like H.264 and VP8 is just a useful distraction at the moment. SEE WE LIKE OPEN SOURCE.....now let's keep encoding those H.264 videos.
Not many? Google has millions, but Microsoft wouldn't have that many.
The point is that Microsoft has zero control over web video codecs which can be seen by the fact that they use Flash in many of their own websites.
Why exactly isn't Theora, or an opened VP8, the very least of three or four evils then?
Because MS already uses H.264 in Silverlight.




Member since:
2007-02-17
Yes. It is likely that they will use VP8 in conjunction with HTML5, make it royalty-free, thereby get it accepted as the standard for video on the web.
This will result in Google no longer being beholden to MPEG LA for permission to run their YouTube business.
Google and Adobe are starting to get chummy also. Flash has, in the past, supported VP6, and it may well be the case that very soon it will support VP8 (possibly while still retaining support for h264). This would allow sites to offer videos as Flash/VP8 rather than Flash/h264, and enable all those sites to also free themselves of control by MPEG LA, whillst still being able to use their Flash tools to write the site.
Why not stop? One would reduce costs and no longer be beholden to the whims of MPEG LA. It could happen as simply as an update to Flash.
So all it requires is Google to re-encode their videos, probably with VP8.
It is estimated that Google has in excess of one million servers. Google could arguably be able to re-encode on million of its most popular videos within a few minutes, and another million within a few more minutes, and tens of millions of its most popular videos within an hour.
Where is the problem here?
Not many? Google has millions, but Microsoft wouldn't have that many.
Why exactly isn't Theora, or an opened VP8, the very least of three or four evils then?
Edited 2010-04-30 04:01 UTC