Linked by Eugenia Loli on Thu 6th May 2010 21:05 UTC
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu The recently released 10.04 version of Ubuntu is the third Long Term Support (LTS) version Canonical has released. I installed this new version on four of my laptops (2 netbooks, 1 normal laptop, 1 portable desktop replacement), and here's my impression of it.
Thread beginning with comment 423168
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Dear Vista
by vodoomoth on Fri 7th May 2010 15:26 UTC
vodoomoth
Member since:
2010-03-30


And you base that on what?
The 1% comes from browser stats and it's likely a conservative estimate.
http://gs.statcounter.com/#os-ww-monthly-200904-201005


Seems like Vista never really took off. Poor thing. For me, this was the worst timesharing M$ OS since Windows 95, which was even better than Vista in all aspects but BSODs.

On topic (I mean "on quote"): maybe (s)he's basing that on the fact so many Linux users just don't browse the web.

Reply Score: 0

RE: Dear Vista
by nt_jerkface on Sat 8th May 2010 03:17 in reply to "Dear Vista"
nt_jerkface Member since:
2009-08-26


Seems like Vista never really took off. Poor thing. For me, this was the worst timesharing MS OS since Windows 95, which was even better than Vista in all aspects but BSODs.


Windows 95 used a junky 16 bit kernel and didn't have true multitasking.

The core of 7 is hardly different from Vista. Vista had problems with its initial release but was fixed before SP2. However the tech press wanted to keep bashing it and MS decided to release a new OS instead of trying to fix Vista's image problem.

I must have asked a dozen people exactly what was wrong with Vista and yet none could give an explanation. They just "knew" it was bad even though they couldn't even specify any problems.

I would then show them a benchmark and they would get even more confused. How is this even possible when we have been told so many times that Vista is bad?
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/windows-7-performance,2442-3.ht...

Windows 7 is better than Vista but to say that Vista sucks in comparison just shows ignorance. Most of the changes in 7 are superficial.

Edited 2010-05-08 03:22 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: Dear Vista
by moondevil on Sat 8th May 2010 07:09 in reply to "RE: Dear Vista"
moondevil Member since:
2005-07-08


Windows 95 used a junky 16 bit kernel and didn't have true multitasking.



Oh man! Get at least your facts straight, if you are speaking against Windows.

Windows 95 had a 32 bit pre-emptive kernel.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_95

I like Linux, but I also like Windows, just use the best tool for the job.

If you are going to bash Windows at least learn how to do it properly. Oh man!

Reply Parent Score: 3