Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th May 2010 15:41 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 424079
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Microsoft should be punished
by Karitku on Thu 13th May 2010 15:28
in reply to "RE: Microsoft should be punished"
I have compared several FOS alternatives before using SharePoint, they simply suck to the bone. Even one of them has a pro version that cost much more than MOS.
I have used several commercial alternatives and they suck even more compared to Sharepoint. Most of them can do basic stuff quite good, but try get them work on enviroment with 10k people, try customise them and you quickly go straight to hell.
Typical problem with Sharepoint is that companies have no clue what they actually want and then they just put one up. Management:"We want Sharepoint!" Techguy:"Okey I installed it on server behind Steves porn magazines." This is so common scene that it explains why so many has bad experience on Sharepoint. It's not something you simply installl and start use. Look Ferrari site and you see something nice done with Sharepoint.




Member since:
2006-02-11
I have compared several FOS alternatives before using SharePoint, they simply suck to the bone. Even one of them has a pro version that cost much more than MOS.