Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th May 2010 22:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 424561
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Wonder why XFS never really caught on?
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Sat 15th May 2010 05:36
in reply to "Wonder why XFS never really caught on?"
RE: Wonder why XFS never really caught on?
by Boldie on Sat 15th May 2010 08:16
in reply to "Wonder why XFS never really caught on?"
The features of btrfs is very sweet, just the rollacks (snapshots) are cool enough. Performance wise it's getting there:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ext4_btrfs_2633&...




Member since:
2006-11-19
I don't know much about BTRFS, but I know that XFS is an awesome journaling file system developed by SGI. Its been in the Linux kernel for some 10 years or so.
With all the 'features' of BTRFS, I'm a bit concerned about the overhead. It seems pretty good for large database servers and so forth, but not sure how well it works in low memory environments (think netbooks, or devices, where incidentally XFS works really well).