Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 19th May 2010 16:28 UTC, submitted by bnolsen
Thread beginning with comment 425572
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Should not have rebraded MKV as webM
by spikeb on Thu 20th May 2010 03:35
in reply to "RE: Should not have rebraded MKV as webM"
RE[2]: Should not have rebraded MKV as webM
by npcomplete on Thu 20th May 2010 05:08
in reply to "RE: Should not have rebraded MKV as webM"
I realize that, but being a subset, WebM itself defines a container that is wholly compatible with Matroska, so any device, software or platform that can understand VP8, MKV, and Vorbis should already be able to play WebM without needing any specific support for it. A number of household media player devices can already play MKV and Vorbis for example.
In other words, WebM itself doesn't define anything not already defined by something else. What's new is VP8, not WebM. If you really need another name to call it, perhaps something like mkm or mkx, etc would've been more appropriate. Again just an opinion, that should not detract from the good news about VP8 in general.
Edited 2010-05-20 05:08 UTC




Member since:
2005-08-18
They didn't just rebrand Matroska. WebM is the combination of the VP3 video codec, Vorbis audo codec and a subset of the Matroska format thus it is more than just Matroska rebranded.