Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 23rd May 2010 09:41 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 426174
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison
by Neolander on Sun 23rd May 2010 14:44
in reply to "RE: H.264 vs VP8 comparison"
RE[3]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison
by Lennie on Sun 23rd May 2010 15:22
in reply to "RE[2]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison"
RE[3]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison
by miker on Mon 24th May 2010 17:34
in reply to "RE[2]: H.264 vs VP8 comparison"
You could't be more wrong. Comparing GIF to JPEG is slightly more meaningful than comparing MP3 to DivX, they are two different formats intended for different purposes.
Gif is a lossless 8-bit (usually) color indexed format that is great for simple computer graphics and illustrations. JPEG is a lossly (with exceptions) 24-bit format that is great for photographs but terrible for illustrations.





Member since:
2005-07-06
I just had a look at both and I barely notice a difference; I'm sure when in full motion the differences will be even less detectable. I am confused, therefore, why people are trying to make out that there is a massive difference between the two of them. I am sure with more optimisations artefacts will be minimised and will be offered as a viable alternative to h264.