Linked by Kroc Camen on Sat 29th May 2010 20:41 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 427200
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: NaCl is not Java (or ActiveX)
by aacs on Sun 30th May 2010 21:21
in reply to "RE: NaCl is not Java (or ActiveX)"




Member since:
2005-07-08
What a piece of nonsense!
NaCL is only providing a portable way to move C and C++ applications to the browser, but only if the applications only use one of the already ported applications.
And most likely a Chrome only solution.
Java and .Net world already support this for ages now, and what "married to the languages" mean?
JVM:
Java, Scala, JRuby, Jython, Jacl, Jaskel, Groovy, ...
.Net:
C#, VB.Net, JSCript.Net, C++/CLI, F#, Axum, IronRuby, IronPyhon, Powershell, ...
JavaFX:
JavaFX language, plus all the JVM ones
Silverlight:
C#, VB.Net, JSCript.Net, IronRuby, IronPyhon, F# (unofficially), C++/CLI might be possible in the future for pure CLR code.
The only thing in common all these runtimes provide is that there is nothing to see here for C/C++ fan boys, languages that I do like very much, but are the source of the majority of security issues we have to suffer nowadays.
So, I honestly don't see the goals of NaCl, besides being Google own plugin solution.